Editorial policy
How we research, write and update guides.
A clear editorial process is part of the product: readers should know what is verified, what is opinion and what may change.
Primary-source preference
For feature names, plan structures and official product capabilities, we prefer the official Pippit website and help resources. Third-party sources can add testing context, but they do not replace live official plan details.
Independent analysis
Workflow suggestions, comparisons and recommendations are editorial judgments. We aim to explain the reason behind a recommendation instead of presenting preferences as facts.
Updates and corrections
Fast-changing pages, especially pricing and model availability, should show a review date. If a material error is found, we correct the page and prioritize the current product state over preserving outdated copy.
AI-assisted drafting
AI tools may assist with ideation, organization or drafting, but publishable content should be checked for factual accuracy, clarity, duplication, unsupported claims and user value.
Commercial relationships
If affiliate links or sponsored placements are added later, they should be disclosed clearly and should not determine the factual conclusion of a review.